Left - Right - Human Right

 

MESSAGE TO A NEW ISRAELI PARTY

 

UNIVERSAL COGNITION

Left - Right –Human Rights

Universal references to communicate with the Planet


 

I-INTRODUCTION

As a result of the Israel-Arab conflict, the conception of basic references are trivialized and utilized in a contemptuous way far from their usual meaning in e.g. the association of Left and Human Rights as reference of terminology favorable to Palestinian people and then trivially understood as hostile to Israel.

This artificial restriction tends to create concepts only understandable from Israelis in a similar way to autism and or to Ghetto self-confinement.

 

 

II-RIGHT AN LEFT

Right refers to the powerful right hand as opposed to unskillful left hand. From there, the privileged place or “the place of privileges is the Right.” The honored people are placed on the right of the King or in religion on the right side of God.


 

III-POLITICAL ORIGIN

In 1789, France tried to adopt constitutional Monarchy and on 27 August 1791, the supporters of the King wanted to grant him a Veto Right and at the time of the vote they came to the right side of the President of the constituent assembly leaving the opponents on the left side.

Since then the conservatives favorable to Power are called rightists, meanwhile the supporters of the social progress are called leftists, in the whole world.

 

IV-CURRENT REFERENCE

 

Today, the rightists are those who are in favor of a total freedom in economy and are opposed to the intervention of the State. They think that the system is self regulated. They value the individual interest over the collective interest. In fact they request the State intervention when the system is near to collapse. This requested freedom is often compared to the freedom given to foxes and poultry at the same time and in the same place.

 

The leftists think that the self regulation of the system has unfair consequences for most of the population and request a systematic state intervention at all level to protect them and to provide them with Justice and welfare, which cannot be self-generated by the system.

 

It appears from the ideas that I read on your site that you are a leftist party and this has to be clearly mentioned and in particular abroad in order to be understood. Trying to escape to the basic references may have disastrous effects.

 

 

V-LEFT AD HUMAN RIGHTS

 

As we have seen the left do not act in the name of an economic system but in the name of the welfare of all people.

To be leftist means to be generous, compassionate, to act for the benefit of all without consideration of individual own interest.

The compassion has no borders and leftists are internationalists by opposition to the Rightist who are nationalists.

Leftists are thus in favor of the application of Human Rights as many as possible and not restricted as in the declaration of UNO.

Generosity limited to a community is not generosity but ETHNOCENTRISM.

The Jewish people have suffered of the lack of Human Rights, which permitted the POGROMS and the HOLOCAUST.

The Jewish People more than anyone else must be in favor of Human Rights because of their experience.

Israel vision of Human Rights is highly questioned in the important issues regarding the Palestinians, anti-Semitism and Holocaust. See below.

 

VI-RIGHTS OF ISRAELIS AND PALESTINIANS

 

I was told that the word Leftist reference was avoided in order to cancel any possibility of link with the problem of Palestinians.It is not serious that an Israeli organizarion excludes the Palestinian issue.

 

It has always been clear from the time of Balfour declaration that Jews and Arab should have both a country. This was delayed by the hostility of the Arab countries as well as of the United Kingdom , but in taking the control of the territories, Israel has become the sole State able to apply the initial Mandate in a proper way with possible adaption due to demographic evolution.

 

You should clearly state that you are in favor of an independent Palestinian State in fine or your generosity might be considered as restricted by Nationalism.

 

The terminology of security currently applied in Israel is based on a short term view.

The real security is the assistance to welfare in the territories.

Currently the poverty of the territories and in particular in Gaza, impairs the security of Israel. In GAZA 1 700 000 people out of which 70% living, below poverty line are confined on 360 KM2.

The blockade of Gaza is not acceptable for people, who are in favor of Human Rights and a clear position should be taken.

 

VII-ANTI-SEMITISM – SHOAH AND ISRAEL

 

Following the Prague Process of 2008 making an equation between Communism and Nazism, the Eastern countries have created a new concept of Genocide challenging and obfuscating the Holocaust and the resurgence of Anti-Semitism and Nazism in Eastern Countries.

Israel is not active regarding these events because the same reasons which generate anti-Semitism generate also hatred of Arab people in these countries that the current  Rightist Government of Israel may consider as geopolitically useful.

This situation is inacceptable and may lead to think that the ceremonies in Yad Vashem might be now theatrical.

 

VIII – CONCLUSION

 

It is absolutely necessary to clarify the above mentioned issues to start an actifivity with clear vision for the others.

 

 

Didier BERTIN

26 JUNE 2011